Tips for Clearing Music for Television
and Motion Pictures
Entertainment Law & Finance, December 2002 &
January 2003.
By Steve Gordon
Music licensing offers ancillary income in a music business that lately
has seen
decreases in sales of recorded product. Even the Internet, which has
negatively
affected record sales, offers music licensing opportunities. In the
following
interview, New York entertainment attorney Steve Gordon discusses the
practical
considerations involved in the licensing of music. Next spring, Gordon
will teach a
course on digital music law and business models at New York University
and present a
seminar at Columbia University on the future of music on the Internet.
Gordon's
contact information, information on the course and seminar, and his
previously
published articles can be found at Steve Gordon Law
Q: What kinds of projects do you work on?
A: TV, movies, documentaries, compilation albums, DVDs and
Internet-based projects.
I recently worked on several interesting jobs in cooperation with
Universal Media
Inc. [a company specializing in finding footage and music]. These
projects included
a documentary on Latin jazz for the Smithsonian Institution, a
companion record album
for Smithsonian Folkways Recordings, a network TV special featuring the
music of Elvis
Presley, and a PBS special featuring Frank Sinatra's duet performances
from his old TV
series, to be released as a home video and on foreign TV. Currently,
I'm working on an
independent movie about a serial murderer who targets punk rock fans,
containing more
than two dozen songs and masters. I also represent a publicly traded
Internet content
provider that is continually securing rights in all kinds of content,
including music,
videos and computer games.
Q: What is the process for securing copyright clearances?
A: The process is basically the same for any kind of project. Research
the songs,
strategize with the client, negotiate the terms and review or, in
certain instances,
prepare the licenses. In regard to the last item, music publishers and
labels will
usually provide their own licenses. However, occasionally a small
label, publisher or
unsigned artist will request that you draft the license.
With respect to research, the kind of material to be cleared will
dictate the nature of
research to be performed. For instance, for musical compositions, the
ASCAP and BMI
databases are excellent sources for identifying the writers and music
publishers. Each
of these databases may have to be explored because each
performing-rights organization
provides information only on the songs in its own repertory. SESAC also
administers
certain songs that will not be included on the ASCAP or BMI sites. In
addition, the
Harry Fox Agency provides information concerning songs that it
represents
(see Songfile.com). If your client is using musical recordings, the
packaging and liner
notes can supply information such as the name of the record company and
artist, and the
release date. If the client is using excerpts of TV, movie or video
footage, someone
should view the credits from the original TV program, movie or music
video to determine
the TV service, studio or record label that controls the copyright in
the footage. The
musical artists, actors and other persons (or their estates) appearing
in the footage
may also have to be cleared depending on various circumstances,
including whether there
is a musical performance in the footage.
Once you have identified those who control rights in the material to be
used, you are
almost ready to approach the owners and negotiate terms. (See sample
clause below.) But
first you must strategize with the client. This conversation should
include what rights
will be required, that is, media, territory, duration, what you think
it will cost and
what to propose to the licensors. This process is the real "art" of
licensing. With
knowledge of the applicable business practices and pricing, you can
advise your client
on the approximate amount of money he or she will have to pay for
clearances; alert him
or her to potential problems, such as material that may be too
expensive and may have
to be replaced; and develop a letter addressed to the owners accurately
reflecting the
precise rights that your client needs and proposing the lowest
reasonable fee or
royalty. The proposed payment, which obviously must be approved by the
client, should
be as low as possible and include a cogent explanation of the reasons
that the owner
should accept such a rate. At the same time, the proposal should not be
so out of whack
with standard business practices that the owner feels insulted.
The negotiation process involves a discussion with the copyright owner
or its
representative about the project, plus continual follow-up. Many of the
projects on
which I work will not make a great deal of money for any individual
copyright owner.
For that reason, many of these requests usually are low-priority items
to the people
from whom I am seeking permission. To do this work, therefore, a
combination of
courtesy and persistence is recommended.
Ultimately, if the licensor doesn't accept your terms, you will have to
negotiate
compromises or even advise the client to drop the desired music. For
instance, trying
to get a hit song for an independent movie may not happen because the
song owner may
not like your client's project, or may not wish to license it to anyone
at any price,
or may propose a fee well beyond your client's ability to pay.
Finally, the owner will send the license, and it is my responsibility
to make sure that
the terms in the license exactly match the understanding between my
client and the owner.
Q: What issues arise specifically in the case of independent movies?
A: From a clearance point of view, the most important difference
between an independent
film and a major studio production is that an independent producer
usually has a lot
less money to spend on anything, including music. Therefore, an
independent filmmaker
may have to curb his or her desire for securing "name-brand" talent.
For instance, if
your client wants to use "Satisfaction" under the opening credits, that
is going to
cost big bucks indeed, unless he or she happens to be a personal friend
of Mick Jagger,
and even then, don't assume a huge discount.
Even if Mick Jagger is your client's best friend, the people who
administer the Stones'
copyrights may never have heard of your client. Music publishers and
labels generally
will adjust their rates downwards based on the size of a movie's
budget. But don't
expect to pay a nominal fee for a hit song just because your client's
budget is modest.
Independent film producers should also understand that no matter how
popular or
recognizable the music in a movie is, people don't watch movies to
listen to music. A
lawyer or clearance person can work with a savvy producer to create a
great soundtrack
without busting the budget. For instance, many music publishers, labels
and managers
may be eager to place new songs written by "baby bands" that will be
more reasonably
priced than songs written by established acts. Another alternative is a
"stock" music
house. Generally, these firms can license both the song and the master,
and therefore
offer one-stop shopping as well as low prices. Finally, a composer or
songwriter/producer
can be hired to write music for specific scenes, or a complete score.
There are many
talented but hungry songwriters who would be happy to work on a
client's project for a
credit and a reasonable fee.
Another way to work within a client's budget is to set up the quote
request as a series
of options. Generally, a film festival license can be secured for a
small fee because
music publishers and labels recognize that festivals are not commercial
enterprises.
Additional rights such as theatrical, free TV, cable and home video can
be requested as
options. Each one may be exercised by paying a specific fee. "Broad
rights"-which include
theatrical, TV and home video-can be expensive. In case your client
does not succeed in
securing commercial theatrical distribution, these options will allow
him or her to gain
exposure for the movie (on cable TV, for instance) for a reasonable fee
without paying
for unnecessary rights. Next month, Steve Gordon will address such
topics as deal points,
"most favored nations," penalties for the failure to secure copyright
clearance, and the
role of a music supervisor.
Q:
Please describe the deal points (e.g., term, territory, royalties or
fees). A: The term will vary depending on the nature of the project. Of
course, you always would like to secure perpetual rights for your
client. But that may not always be possible. For instance, in regard to
a TV project, music publishers and labels will customarily limit the
term to three to five years. A longer period will cost a lot more
money. One way to accommodate future uses is, again, to set up options.
The original term can be three years, with an option for another three.
That way, your client doesn't have to pay the additional fees unless he
or she actually exploits the program for a longer term. Movie and TV
producers will generally seek worldwide to maximize the audience for,
and income from, their projects. Producers of album compilations, on
the other hand, may wish to target the U.S. and Canada market only. So
the scope of the territory provision will depend on the business
interests of your client. Of course, the most important item in
virtually all clearance licenses will be the money. Generally, flat
fees will be required for TV and movies because that is the standard
business practice. On the other hand, if you license a song or master
for an album or a home video, you can expect to pay a penny rate per
unit. How much you pay will depend primarily on the nature of the
project. In regard to a compilation album, although there are
exceptions, the owner of the track (generally a record company) will
require a per-unit penny rate against an advance. If the penny rate is
10 cents, then an advance payment of $1,000 may be required, with a
"rollover" payment of another $1,000 for sales exceeding 10,000, and
additional rollover payments after that for each block of 10,000 units.
The underlying song will be subject to a statutory mechanical license,
currently 8 cents per unit, although it may be possible to secure
reductions from such rate in certain circumstances (if a charitable
purpose is involved, for example). Clearing music for a motion picture
is a whole different ball game because there is no compulsory license
for use of musical compositions in audiovisual works. The money
demanded for even a never-quite-famous song can easily reach six
figures for a movie to be distributed by a major studio. The owner of
the master, usually the record company, probably will want at least an
equal amount for the master recording. Q: What is meant by the phrase
"Most Favored Nations"? A: Also referred to as "MFN," this is a
business practice than can affect all the terms of a license. It means
that you cannot treat the owner or licensor of content less well than
any other owner or licensor of content used in a similar manner. The
practice is very common in regard to concert TV programs featuring a
dozen full-length musical performances. No one who licenses any song
for such a program wants to get less money or give more rights than any
other licensor. MFN also plays a big role in audio compilation albums.
It exists but is less common in regard to clearing music for movies,
because in a movie each piece of music is often used in a different
way. For instance, one song may be used over the credits, another song
may be used for only a few moments in the background of a scene, and
another song may be heard as a theme throughout the movie. Q: What are
some reasons that a copyright clearance cannot be secured? A: Money is
the most common reason. In regard to a movie, although some baby bands,
composers or songwriters may love the exposure that your client can
create, established artists and bands may not need the exposure. They
already have it. Therefore, the price can be prohibitively high. To
give a recent example from my own practice, we could not get the price
of a Bee Gees song down for an independent movie. So we replaced it
with a new song composed by my client. Another problem is that the
copyright owner, or his or her representative, may not wish to be
associated with your client's project for whatever reason. I once had a
problem with getting
permission to use "Macarena" for a Chipmunks video. Apparently, the
composers did not relish the idea of their song being performed by
cartoon characters. Q: What are the possible penalties if copyright
clearances are not secured? A: Perhaps the worst-case scenario is an
injunction, which is available as a remedy for copyright infringement.
Your client's project could be shut down completely. If it's yanked out
of distribution, not only are potential profits lost, but there also
could be serious expenses incurred in retrieving the product from
warehouses or retail outlets (as there would be if a DVD were
involved). Of course, copyright owners have other remedies available to
them, including statutory damages and attorney fees, if they properly
registered their works. Therefore, the price of using a copyright
without permission can be quite steep indeed. Q: What is the role of a
music supervisor? A: A good music supervisor can identify music that
could enhance your client's project. But due to budget constraints,
experienced music supervisors make their living working with big studio
productions. When they can be afforded, they have knowledge and
contacts that could prove valuable, especially when it comes to finding
new, cutting-edge music. The client can't depend on lawyers or
clearance people to be his or her "ears." Depending on the budget,
therefore, the client may have to be his or her own music supervisor,
although a knowledgeable lawyer with good industry contacts can be very
helpful. Q: What is involved in licensing music for Internet-based
projects? How is it or other new technologies an emerging area for
clearances? A: New technologies, including the Internet, have created
new uses for all kinds of content. New business practices and forms of
licensing have also emerged. The issues and rules can be quite complex,
depending on what you are trying to do (e.g., webcasting, streaming or
downloading) and the kind of content you are trying to clear
(interactive games, music, etc.). Perhaps the fastest-growing areas of
music licensing are interactive webcasting and video on demand.
Already, satellite systems and digital cable modem services are
offering content on demand. Concert specials accommodate themselves
beautifully to these new technologies. Eventually, concert videos may
also be available on the Web on an on-demand basis. Therefore, in
addition to clearing a concert special for TV and home video, clearance
people will find themselves clearing for on-demand uses. This will
entail educating the licensor as to the new technologies and, in the
case of webcasting, assuring copyright owners that your client will
protect the owners' copyrights with encryption technologies to prevent
piracy.
Sample Clause for Synchronization License
License # (Basic Cable Television)
Date:
Effective Date: In consideration of the terms and provisions of this
agreement as
hereinbelow set forth, we hereby license to you, nonexclusively, the
right to record the
musical selection set forth in Paragraph "2," below, in synchronization
or timed
relationship with the single television production known
as________________________in
the territory and for the purposes hereinbelow described.
This license shall apply and be limited to the musical composition and
type and duration
of usage set forth below, and as compensation therefor you agree to pay
and we agree to
accept the sums indicated:
TITLE: COMPOSER(S): TYPE OF USE: PERFORMANCE RIGHTS SOCIETY: FEE: SHARE
REPRESENTED:
(1) This license herein granted is limited superficially to use in
connection with the
origination, transmission and public exhibition of said production by
means of satellite
(DBS) and basic cable television over such facilities as you may
determine may be
otherwise restricted hereunder, provided, however, that production will
not be exhibited
by so-called pay, subscription or commercial television, or similar
method and will not
be recorded or exhibited on audiovisual cassettes or any other sight
and sound device,
without our prior written consent, it being understood that such usages
shall require
licensing and payment of additional fees to be negotiated between us.
No sound recording
shall be manufactured, sold, licensed or used separate or apart from
said film or
videotape.
(2) Basic Cable Television shall mean exhibition throughout the
Territory of the Program
performing the Compositions by means of cable television, whether such
programming is
transmitted by wires, cables, satellite or other communication
channels, for which
members of the public may pay for the transmission service provided by
the cable system,
but do not otherwise pay a premium for the programming transmitted by
such cable system.
(3) The license herein granted is a license to synchronize and record
only and does not
authorize or permit any other use, it being understood that performing
rights licenses
must be secured from any performing rights society or other entity
having the legal
right to issue such licenses as the owner of or on behalf of the owner
of such rights
in any licensed territory in which the music as recorded hereunder may
be performed.
All rights of every nature and description not herein expressly
licensed to you are
reserved by us for our use and benefit.
(4) You shall have the further right, but at your sole cost and
expense, to edit, arrange
and rearrange the music and lyrics for purposes of recording hereunder,
provided that
no substantial music or lyric changes shall be made without our prior
written consent.
This license shall not be deemed to include any right to parody the
original music
and/or lyrics of the songs. Any new arrangements hereunder shall be
made only by persons
acting as "employees for hire," but at your sole cost and expense, and
all copyrights
therein and all renewals, extensions and reversionary rights interests
thereof throughout
the world shall be deemed assigned to and owned by the copyright owner
of the underlying
composition, subject to your use under this agreement.
(5) The license herein granted shall be for and limited to the
territory of ___________.
(6) Your rights for use covered by this license shall commence on the
effective date of
first broadcast in ____ for a period of two years.
(7) On expiration of such term, all rights licensed hereunder shall
revert to us without
further notice and in their entirety.
(8) On completion of production, you shall furnish to us two copies of
the music cue
sheets for said production (if such a cue sheet has not been furnished
previously with
regard to the production).
(9) No warranty or representation is made in connection with this
license except that
we warrant that we have the right to issue this license subject to the
terms and
conditions hereof. In any event, our total liability under such
warranty is limited to
the amount paid by you hereunder.
(10) This license shall run to you, your successors and assigns,
provided that you shall
remain liable for the performance of all the terms and conditions of
this license on
your part to be performed, and provided further that any disposition of
said film or
videotape of any copies thereof shall be subject to all the terms
hereof.
(11) SPECIAL PROVISIONS: License also includes Foreign Television. Term
of three years
from initial airing in each country. All television media excluding
pay-per-view. World
outside United States and Canada. Fee _____.
(12) License will become null and void if payment not received within
60 days of dated
license.
(13) This is the entire agreement between the parties with respect to
the subject matter
hereof. No modification, amendment, waiver, termination or discharge of
this agreement
shall be binding unless in writing and signed by the party to be
charged. No waiver of
any provision shall be a continuing waiver thereafter. This agreement
shall be deemed
to have been made in the state of New York and its validity,
construction, performance,
breach and operation shall be governed by the laws of the state of New
York or, if
applicable, the United States copyright law. -Steve Gordon
Steve Gordon is an entertainment attorney and consultant
based in
New York. Telephone: (917) 912-3400; e-mail: steve@stevegordonlaw.com.
He formerly served as director of business affairs for Sony Music
Entertainment.